The Shema, found in Deuteronomy 6:4, is one of the most pivotal verses in Jewish scripture, often recited as a declaration of faith: “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” This affirmation of the oneness of God has led many to question its compatibility with Christian doctrines like the Trinity. From a Trinitarian perspective, however, the Shema does not negate the Trinity but rather offers a profound insight into the nature of God, which complements rather than contradicts Trinitarian theology.
The Meaning of 'Echad'
The word “one” in the Shema, rendered in Hebrew as echad, holds a semantic richness that goes beyond mere numerical singularity. This term can signify both a singular entity and a unity of multiple elements, which is pivotal for understanding its implications in the context of Trinitarian theology.
In the biblical narrative, echad frequently appears in contexts where it denotes a collective or compound unity, thereby offering a nuanced view that can resonate with the concept of the Trinity:
Genesis 1:5 provides an early example where echad describes the first day. Here, day and night, though distinct phases, are referred to as echad – one day. This usage suggests that echad can encompass diverse components forming a singular whole, much like the Trinity where three distinct persons exist in one divine nature.
Genesis 2:24 speaks of marriage, where a man and a woman leave their families to become echad flesh. This verse is not suggesting that the two individuals merge into a single physical entity but rather that they form a new, unified identity through their union. This reflects the Trinitarian perspective where God is one essence, yet three distinct persons, each maintaining individuality while being part of an inseparable unity.
Moving to Ezra 2:64, the assembly of returning exiles from Babylon is described as echad, totaling 42,360 people. Here, echad does not imply that all these individuals lose their personhood to become a single entity; instead, it highlights the collective unity of the group. This collective aspect of echad parallels the way Christians view the Trinity – as one God in three persons, united in purpose and essence but distinct in personhood.
Ezekiel 37:17 uses echad in a prophetic vision where two sticks representing the divided kingdoms of Israel are joined into one. This act of joining underscores unity, not uniformity, aligning with the Trinitarian doctrine where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct yet unified in their divine mission and essence.
These scriptural examples illustrate that echad in Hebrew scripture is not confined to mathematical singularity but extends to denote a unity where diversity exists within oneness. This understanding of echad provides a framework through which the Trinitarian doctrine can be seen as consistent with the Jewish proclamation of God’s oneness. The Shema, therefore, invites believers to appreciate the profound mystery of God, who is both singular in essence and plural in relationship, a mystery that the New Testament further unfolds in the doctrine of the Trinity.
New Testament Reflections
When we turn our attention to the New Testament, we encounter theological language that continues to reflect and expand upon the concept of unity found in the Hebrew Scriptures. The Greek word “hise” (one) in Galatians 3:28 offers a parallel to the Hebrew word echad. Here, Paul writes, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” This passage does not deny the distinct identities of these groups; instead, it declares that in Christ, there exists a spiritual unity that goes beyond these distinctions. This unity mirrors the Trinitarian doctrine where Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct yet united in essence.
Furthermore, the New Testament frequently attributes divine titles and roles to Jesus, which in the Old Testament are reserved solely for Yahweh. For instance, in Hebrews 1:10, Jesus is directly addressed with the words from Psalm 102:24-27: “You, Lord, laid the foundation of the earth in the beginning, and the heavens are the work of your hands.” This isn’t just a metaphorical or honorary acknowledgment; it’s a deep and meaningful theological statement that identifies Jesus with the Creator God of the Old Testament, Yahweh.
This identification is not an isolated occurrence. Throughout the New Testament, Jesus is portrayed as the divine Son, the Word who was with God and was God (John 1:1), and the one through whom all things were made (John 1:3). His role in creation, as mentioned in Hebrews, aligns Him with the acts attributed to Yahweh in the Old Testament, suggesting a continuity of identity and function that fits within a Trinitarian framework.
Moreover, the portrayal of Jesus as the Son in Matthew 28:19 where the baptismal formula is given, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” clearly articulates the triune nature of God. The use of “name” in the singular for the three persons underscores their unity.
This Trinitarian reflection is not just about titles but about shared divine attributes and actions. In John 10:30, Jesus declares, “I and the Father are one.” The Greek here, again, uses “hise,” not implying a numerical one but a unity of purpose, and essence. This unity is about the deep communion and shared identity between the Father and the Son, which does not erase their distinctiveness but rather underscores their oneness in essence.
The New Testament, therefore, does not simply adopt the concept of unity from the Shema but reveals to us the theological framework where unity encompasses both the divine relationship and the shared divine essence. This framework supports the belief in one God who exists as three distinct persons, each fully God, yet together, they are one God in essence. This interpretation does not contradict the Shema but rather fulfills and deepens its meaning, showing that the unity of God can indeed be multifaceted, relational, and communal, aspects that resonate deeply with the human experience of unity in diversity.
Conclusion
The Shema, when understood correctly, does not undermine the Trinity but rather proves it. It presents a God who is one in essence yet exists in a relationship that can be seen as a unity of persons. This view respects the Jewish tradition’s emphasis on monotheism while also embracing the Christian revelation of God’s triune nature. Thus, the Shema, far from being an obstacle, it becomes a bridge for understanding the Trinitarian God, providing us a firm foundation for the Christian doctrine that celebrates the unity within the Godhead.
For more defenses of the Trinity be sure to read the following articles:
